miscarriages of justice Essays -- essays research papers

The statement "It is better that 10 iniquitous persons escape than that one innocent suffer" summarises and highlights the mistakes and in evaluators in the criminal justice administration. In a just baseball club, the innocent would never be charged, nor convicted, and the sheepish would always be caught and punished. Unfortunately, it seems this would be impossible to achieve due to the union in which we live. Therefore, miscarriages of justice occur in the criminal justice corpse more frequently than is publicised or known to the public at large. They are routine and would have to be considered as a salutary problem in our society. The law is what or so people respect and remain by, if society bottom of the inningnot trust the law that governs them, then there allow for be serious consequences including the possible breakdown of that society. In hostel to have a fair and just society, miscarriages of justice must not only suit exceptional but motiflly cease to occur altogether.A miscarriage of justice is basically "a failure to attain the desired shoemakers last result of justice". In our society, every person should be set make uply and fairly as "our legal institutions are premised on the idea that our legal system is both neutral and impartial, and that all persons are equal in the eyes of the law". The country in which we were born, the language we speak, the twine of our skin and our gender should be of no relevance in deciding the outcome of justice. All these notions are part of "due process" and if this occurs in our society, why are there still miscarriages of justice? Our legal system is based on the fact that everyone deserves a fair hearing. In scheme this is ideal, but due to human nature mistakes volition always occur. The penetration of desoxyribonucleic acid into the courtroom ( which can free innocent people wrongfully convicted of a crime twenty years ago) and Andersons view on allowing juries to admit questions and participate more in trials (by stating the evidence on which they base their convictions), on the surface appear beneficial to the outcome of justice, and in some cases this will be the result. However, justice will always be hindered by cosmos and their corrupt side. Unfortunately, this is part of human nature and even the people in high positions are not immune.When a person is accused of cosmos "guilty", society must assume the person is innocen... ...ct that in little serious crimes the defendant will plead guilty in order to receive a better deal.The theories of Anderson, Hogg, pushchair and Wilson are justified opinions and could be expedient to the criminal justice system. However, even if these theories are implemented into our society, corruption will still always occur. Unfortunately, it is just part of human nature. It is futile to put new methods of judgement without considering the fact that corruption occurs throughout all l evels of society. Juries, police, and lawyers can all be persuaded and succumb to corruption if it suits their needs to do so. Likewise, DNA samples can be tampered with or plagued by human error. It is a deplorable circle and until human beings change, miscarriages will continue to occur. Miscarriages of justice are emphatically not exceptional and occur much more frequently than most people realise. They place a great burden on our society as a whole and cause injustices and hardships to many people. Just because we do not hear about them, does not mean they dont exist. As Walker states "since justice is applied by fallible, prejudiced human beings, miscarriages are inevitable".